Call 1-800-949-4ADA
for Technical Assistance
Case Law:
U.S. v. California Mobile Home Park Management Co., 29 F.3d
1413 (9th Cir. 1994).
- Defendant had refused to waive a guest fee for a resident that
needed a live-in home health care aide.
- Generally applicable fees are not immune from scrutiny under
the Fair Housing Act's reasonable accommodation mandate. To exempt
generally applicable fee rules from would permit landlords to
circumvent the Fair Housing Act simply by imposing fees for certain
matters, rather than imposing a flat ban or other type of restrictive
rule.
- The challenged fee rule must, have the potential to deny persons
an "equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling" because
of their handicap. There are many types of residential fees that
affect handicapped and non-handicapped residents equally and are
clearly proper. Fees that merit closer scrutiny are those with
unequal impact, imposed in return for permission to engage in
conduct that a landlord is required to permit under the Fair Housing
Act.
- A reviewing court should examine, among other things,
- the amount of fees imposed,
- the relationship between the amount of fees and the overall
housing cost,
- the proportion of other tenants paying such fees,
- the importance of the fees to the landlord's overall revenues,
- and the importance of the fee waiver to the handicapped
tenant.