Call 1-800-949-4ADA
for Technical Assistance
The Americans With Disabilities Act is a federal statute that requires employers to focus on the ABILITIES of applicants rather than on their DISABILITIES.
The ADA protects persons who have a disability, who have a record
of disability, who are
perceived as having a disability (whether they do or not), or
have a relationship or association with persons who have a disability.
The following areas of your recruitment and selection process could be affected:
The recruitment process begins with letting people know that a
job is available. Because of the way in which the job is advertised,
persons with disabilities may never have an opportunity to know
about the job.
Post or advertise the information in locations that are accessible
to persons with mobility
impairments.
Large print on job notices posted at worksites or in employment
offices may help a visually
handicapped person to be aware of the job.
A job advertisement containing a phone number (whether or not an address is also given), should be made accessible to persons with hearing impairments by providing a TDD number (telecommunications device for the deaf).
If the advertisement indicates that the applicant should apply in person, make sure that there is access for those with mobility impairments, such as handicapped parking spaces, ramps, and elevators if the interviews are not held on the first floor.
The job application is a pre-employment inquiry under the Act.
Itþs purpose is to gather
information on the skills, abilities, training, credentials, and
references of the applicant. It also serves to identify where
an applicant can be reached. It cannot be used to elicit information
about whether an applicant is an individual with a disability or
as to the nature or severity of such disability.
Questions seeking information on the applicantþs prior or current illnesses, medication, medical treatment, substance abuse, disabilities, injuries, or Workers' Compensation claims are prohibited, as are all inquiries into the applicantþs family medical problems.
Also prohibited are questions so closely related to a disability that the individual's response is likely to elicit information about a disability.
Under the ADA, a person is considered a qualified individual with
a disability if s/he can
perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable
accommodation.
Although the ADA does not require an employer to have job descriptions, they can be used as evidence of the essential functions of the job. Be sure that your descriptions are up-to-date and that they differentiate between the essential and the marginal job duties. Non-essential functions are those which are not absolutely necessary for the job, although they might be convenient for the employer.
The purpose of the interview is to investigate the ability, education,
skill, work experience,
licenses or certifications of the applicant which are necessary
to do the job.
Questions about whether an applicant is an individual with a disability,
or as to the nature or
severity of such disability, are prohibited.
The best technique is to describe the job in detail so that the
applicant has a reasonable
understanding of what is expected, and ask the applicant whether
s/he can perform the job
functions with or without reasonable accommodation. An employer
can also ask applicants to describe or demonstrate how, with or
without reasonable accommodation, they will be able to perform the
job functions, as long as all applicants in the job category are
asked to do this.
Interviews must be held in an accessible place. Is there an entry
which can be used by those with mobility problems? Is parking
available near the entry? Are ramps and/or elevators available?
If you reasonably believe that an applicant will not be able to
perform a job function because of a known disability, you may ask
that particular applicant to describe or demonstrate how s/he would
perform the function. When an employer could reasonably believe
that an applicant will need reasonable accommodation to perform
the functions of the job, either because the applicant has an obvious
disability or because of voluntary disclosures by the applicant,
the employer may ask whether s/he needs reasonable accommodation
and what type of reasonable accommodation would be needed to perform
the functions of the job.
No. The ADA requires only that tests which screen
out persons with disabilities be job
related and consistent with business necessity. However, tests
which measure aptitude, physical agility, intelligence and specific
skills are not considered to be "medical examinations" under the
ADA and are not subject to the additional special rules which govern
medical examinations.
Make sure that any tests you do use are designed to test the essential
functions of the job, and that they are accurate predictors of successful
performance on the job. If the tests you use screen out persons
with disabilities, they must be job related and consistent with
business necessity.
Employers have an obligation to provide persons with disabilities reasonable accommodation to enable them to take the test. The place where the tests are held must be accessible. Persons with disabilities must be given reasonable accommodation to enable them to take the test.
For example, a person with dyslexia should be given an opportunity to take an oral test instead of a written test unless the ability to read is the skill the written test is designed to measure. Persons with disabilities might need a longer time to complete the test. If the job does not require hearing, but the test does, you should have a sign language interpreter or other appropriate accommodation for a deaf applicant. This does not mean that you have to employ a sign language interpreter at all times. Your job advertisement can indicate that applicants requiring reasonable accommodation notify you in advance so that you can make the appropriate arrangements.
Applicants should not be disqualified from a job they have the
ability to perform because a
disability prevents them from taking the test as it is presented.
When the employer's failure to make reasonable accommodation negatively
affects test results, persons who really are qualified can
be excluded. This is what the ADA was designed to prohibit.
Remember, you are testing the applicantþs ability to perform
the job, you are not testing
the applicant's ability to take a test.
Test results cannot be used to exclude an individual with a disability
unless: (1) the tested skill is necessary to perform an essential
function of the position and (2) there is no reasonable accommodation
that can be made available to enable the individual to perform that
essential function or (3) providing the necessary accommodation
would cause undue hardship.
Yes.
MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS ARE PROHIBITED UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE
MADE A JOB OFFER TO THE APPLICANT. There are no exceptions.
Employment can be conditioned on the results of an applicantþs post-offer medical examination.
NOTE: if you require medical examinations, yo must require
medical examinations of
all entering employees, or all entering employees in the same job
category for a certain position. You cannot give an examination
to some and not to others.
All medical information, without exception, about applicants or
employees MUST BE KEPT
CONFIDENTIAL.
Keeping medical information confidential means keeping it in a
separate medical file, not in the applicant's or employee's personnel
folder.
Medical information about applicants or employees may be shared
with supervisors if the
applicant is hired and requires accommodation such as modification
of job duties or restriction of hours. It may be shared with
safety or first aid personnel if the condition is one which might
require emergency medical treatment. Medical information must
be shared with government officials investigating compliance with
the ADA. Since the ADA does not preempt state Workers' Compensation
laws, the employer is free to submit information to those offices
or to second injury funds without violating the ADA. Employers
may also use the information for insurance purposes when it is necessary
to administer a health insurance plan.
The ADA neither requires nor prohibits drug testing. Testing
for illegal use of drugs is NOT
considered to be a "medical examination." You may test applicants
prior to making an offer of employment. It is best to test
all applicants (or all applicants for a certain position) and not
just those who "look" as if they take drugs. The ADA protects
those who are "perceived" as having a disability, as well as those
who actually have one.
Drug testing does not have to be related either to job duties or
business necessity. If you do test for drugs be sure that
the procedures you use conform to applicable federal, state and
local law. The ADA considers that a positive drug test is indicative
of current drug use. An individual currently engaging in the
illegal use of drugs is not a protected individual under the ADA
when the employer acts on the basis of such use.
No. Physical agility tests, in which an applicant demonstrates
the ability to perform actual or
simulated job tasks, are not medical examinations under the ADA.
Thus, they can be given
before an offer of employment is made. Note, however, that
these tests are still subject to other parts of the ADA. Thus,
if a test screens out an applicant on the basis of disability, the
employer must be prepared to demonstrate that the test is job related
and consistent with business necessity. Requiring employees
to continue to meet physical criteria established for the job can
help in making this showing.
The ADA does not compel an employer to hire a person who would be a direct threat to his or her own health or safety, or to the health and safety of others at the worksite.
Before you decide not to hire someone because you think s/he poses a direct threat, you must first determine that the individual poses a significant risk of substantial harm to the health and safety of the individual or others that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation. This determination must be based on an individualized assessment of the individual's present ability to safely perform the essential functions of the job. The specific risk posed by the individual should be identified. The determination of whether an individual poses a direct threat should be based on the following factors:
1. the duration of the risk;
2. the nature and severity of the potential harm;
3. the likelihood that the potential harm will occur; and
4. the imminence of the potential harm.
Your assessment of a direct threat to health or safety must be based upon a reasonable judgment that relies on the most current medical knowledge and/or on the best available objective evidence.
ADA Regional Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Hotline, (800) 949-4232 (voice/TTY).
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1801 L Street, NW, Washington,
DC 20507,
(800) 669-4000 (Voice) to reach EEOC field offices; for publications
call (800) 800-3302 or
(800) 669-EEOC (voice/TTY).
This brochure was written by Marjorie E. Karowe, Attorney, Schenectady,
New York. This
publication is taken from a more extensive review of the topic entitled
"Employment Screening,
Medical Examinations, Health Insurance and the ADA," which is currently
available from your
Regional Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center at
1-800-949-4232, or from LRP
Publications (specify Product #31015.SCREENING, 38 pp., $16) at
Dept. NIDRR, PO Box 980, Horsham, PA 19044-0980, phone 1-800-341-7874,
Fax 1-215-784-9639.
This material was produced by the Program on Employment and Disability, School of Industrial and Labor Relations - Extension Division, Cornell University, and funded by a grant from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (grant #H133D10155). An English language version has been reviewed for accuracy by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. However, opinions about the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) expressed in this material are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the viewpoint of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or the publisher. The Commission's interpretations of the ADA are reflected in its ADA regulations (29 CFR Part 1630) and its Technical Assistance Manual for Title I of the Act.
Cornell University is authorized by the National Institute on Disability
and Rehabilitation
Research (NIDRR) to provide information, materials, and technical
assistance to individuals and entities that are covered by the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA). However, you should be aware
that NIDRR is not responsible for enforcement of the ADA. The information,
materials, and/or technical assistance are intended solely as informal
guidance, and are neither a determination of your legal rights or
responsibilities under the Act, nor binding on any agency with enforcement
responsibility under the ADA.
In addition to serving as a National Materials Development Project
on the Employment
Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Program
on Employment and
Disability also serves as the training division of the Northeast
Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center. This
publication is one of a series edited by Susanne M. Bruyere, Ph.D.,
C.R.C., Director of the ILR Program on Employment and Disability
at Cornell University.
Other Titles in this Implementing the ADA Series:
These and other informational brochures can be accessed on the
World Wide Web at:
www.ilr.cornell.edu/ped/ada
For further information about publications such as these, contact
the ILR Program on
Employment and Disability, Cornell University, 102 ILR Extension,
Ithaca, New York
14853-3901; or at 607/255-2906 (Voice), 607/255-2891 (TDD), or 607/255-2763
(Fax).